Token Daily

13 3

wonderfulcarscent Yesterday

Absolutely not.

1

BTC_Forever Yesterday

Excellent idea!

2

LostPhotograph redditor for 4 weeks Yesterday

When even your taxi driver is in on it....It's doomed.

1

One-eyed-snake Yesterday

I would never buy bitcoin. Some people got rich off of it and a lot of people are losing their asses. Or already lost most of their ass

1

Stink-Finger Yesterday

If someone is stupid enough to buy bitcoin, sell it to them. Then take back the bitcoin for some magic beans.

1

SomeUnicornsFly 11 hs ago

> Then take back the bitcoin You dont know much about bitcoin do you

1

Stink-Finger 10 hs ago

Know enough not to sink any money into it. And I also called the crash....

1

SomeUnicornsFly 5 hs ago

Do you realize what bitcoin's value was just a few years ago? It has steadily gone up in value. Just because it spiked for a brief moment in time doesnt mean it crashed, it just returned to the mean.

1

Stink-Finger 3 hs ago

You should buy some.

1

SomeUnicornsFly 3 hs ago

i did. Unfortunately I'm not rich enough to make any sort of meaningful investment in anything

1

Sneakybobo redditor for 3 months Yesterday

Soon someone will make a hole in some public restroom and sell bitcoin from there.

3

millsdmb Yesterday

nope, I used to in the gox days but now there are Undercovers. gotta be a registered money transmission business (a bank)

1

Melting_Harps Yesterday

FastBitcoins’ founder and Jenkins’s pal, Danny Brewster, says he wants his point-of-sale terminals to be adopted in retail stores. (He gave Jenkins’s own device to him pro bono.) He says he’s currently in talks about installing them in businesses which he didn’t want to name, but which he said had 20,000 locations worldwide. “It’s aimed at people interested in holding bitcoins, or for contributing to people blackballed on Patreon or PayPal.”

For those of you wondering,this is the exact cunt who ran off with Neo-Bee's funds when Cyprus was collapsing; this guy sent us back several years in the public image. We seriously had a real usecase while the entire World was watching back in 2013, and this imbecile decided to run off and buy a Bentley and let the entire thing collapse.

Fuck this guy and his irredeemable company. How is that these media outlets don't do the slightest amount of research into who these guys are and what they've done?

5

Thoomaeas Yesterday

Holy shit, Danny Brewster is back. I held some of his shitcoin scam on Bitfunder back in the day. 2018 is the new 2014 confirmed. I thought he was in hiding after he stole 9800 BTC. Why expose himself with this new venture if he already made a fortune from his Neo-Bee scam?

1

Bitcoin_21 redditor for 3 months Yesterday

nice find. ahhhh, the good old times!

1

GA_Thrawn Yesterday

lol that cunt didn't set us back several years. While he might be a cunt, he didn't set us back years. Things aren't THAT vulnerable. That's cute you think that though

2

cryptocyprus Yesterday

I think you're extremely behind in exactly what happened. Feel free to criticise me but at least get your facts straight first.

3

Melting_Harps Yesterday

Go on, tell us. Edit: Never mind, I'm not going to give you a platform to give shallow platitudes and how your new venture will make up for everything (including going dark for YEARS!). Its clear we've seen enough of you around here: >As per the last update everything with Cyprus is on hold until I free up some more funds, the registration process will be closed shortly on the redemption site (later than planned) I will then be allowing people to exchange their neobee for equity in the new entity (more details will be released as soon as I get everything launched and tested properly). The remaining NeoBee tokens will then be paid out over time as funds flow into the redemption pool from my own profits from Fastbitcoins.com and then later on anything else that is recovered from the legal processes regarding Cyprus.

1

cryptocyprus Yesterday

There is plenty of information available, it all came out over the last 3 year's following all the court cases. DYOR on that, I'm beyond fed up of explaining it to people that are as wide of the mark as you are. As for the current state of affairs, private litigation is underway to hold those that made the false accusations against me and those that tried to blackmail me accountable. When all is complete any proceeds from that will be returned to those that backed Neo & Bee. Also to add any personal profits from fastbitcoins are being added to the pool of funds enabling those that backed Neo to benefit from that too. Have a nice day.

1

reddit-already-mate redditor for 2 days Yesterday

Which he then uses to fund FakeTaxi

6

SAT0SHl redditor for 7 weeks Yesterday

Baby steps ;-)

3

i_gotta_say Yesterday

Inb4 "London taxi driver arrested for running a money transmission business without a licence."

22

wiscokev Yesterday

where's your loicense for that joke m8

9

AmbitiousSpeed0 redditor for 4 weeks Yesterday

where's your loicense for that irony m8

2

krotans_kroutons Yesterday

Adoption confirmed?? Oh wait, no, it's literally just one taxi driver.

0

ABitcoinAllBot Yesterday

Here is the link to the original comment thread. Or you can comment here to start a discussion. Author: _statues_dietoo

1

3

2

5

3

5 3

2 4

3

8 5

2

1 4

5 2

TipToeThruCrypto 1 week ago

https://archive.is/XcaIe

http://archivecaslytosk.onion/XcaIe

1

FilthyFiatLover 1 week ago

It's fun to watch BTC be collateral damage, but for real these sanctions are completely unjust and insane. They're also pretty transparently merely a stepping stone to a war. How the US thinks it's going to successfully occupy a country with more than three times the population of Iraq in 2003, and with far more cultural cohesion than that kitbashed country, is beyond me.

3

barsoapguy 1 week ago

we have no desire to go to war with Iran, we don't want them to have Nukes though so if it comes to it we might lob some missles at their infrastructure and call it a day .

1

FilthyFiatLover 1 week ago

Except the little fact that they have no nuclear weapons program, and never have had one. They'd also met all their obligations under the ridiculous deal we forced them into, to prevent a bomb we well know they don't have and aren't trying to make https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/world/middleeast/us-agencies-see-no-move-by-iran-to-build-a-bomb.html before we unilaterally backed out of the deal, not meeting any of our agreed promises.

2

jstolfi 1 week ago

Iranian sources have told CoinDesk that some of them are no longer able to access the cryptocurrency swap platform ShapeShift, even when using virtual private networks (VPNs).

That is impossible! The whitepaper proves that bitcoin is censorship-resistant. Bitcoin users will frustrate the US government, not the other way around!

6

scatoclysm 1 week ago

Anyone trying to run a crypto company as proper business, it’s basically impossible to avoid this. It’s either bend over and let the regulators n your backdoor, or get shutdown. A decentralized crypto to crypto exchange is the only way to keep their damn dirty nose pickers out of people’s business.

2

codestaxx 1 week ago

You can always move to a more friendly non invasive country. Exit is always an option. Downvote me but do it from Malta.

1

scatoclysm 1 week ago

Didn't think of that as a solution, but yeah....that'd work fine too.

1

SnapshillBot 1 week ago

On this day, 4 years ago, I had my first run in with Bitcoin. I have preached the Gospel of Satoshi many times since.

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^(I am a bot.) ^([Info](/r/SnapshillBot) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=\/r\/SnapshillBot))

5

4 4

CommunityPoints Redditor for 3 months. 40 mins ago

/u/mashina55 tipped 447 Donuts for this post!

1

psswrd12345 7 hs ago

This is extremely promising. I encourage everyone to read the questions laid out in their RFI. Reading between the lines, the CFTC is being lobbied to approve an ether-based ETP. But they have very fair concerns about what happens to the value of the native asset (ether) after we fork from PoW to PoS. They are choosing to crowd source this information from the entire community, as opposed to relying on answers of a private few. This is an extraordinary opportunity and I encourage everyone capable of stringing coherent words together to offer a formal response to their request.

2

psswrd12345 8 hs ago

This is extremely promising. I encourage everyone to read the questions laid out in their RFI. Reading between the lines, the CFTC is being lobbied to approve an ether-based ETP. But they have very fair concerns about what happens to the value of the native asset (ether) after we fork from PoW to PoS. They are choosing to crowd source this information from the entire community, as opposed to relying on answers of a private few. This is an extraordinary opportunity and I encourage everyone capable of stringing coherent words together to offer a formal response to their request.

11

alsomahler 23 mins ago

> they have very fair concerns about what happens to the value of the native asset (ether) after we fork from PoW to PoS. As with any fork, the native asset will be split. There will be the original one and the new one. As long as the private key isn't spent, there value of the asset will be split over both assets. This could end up in 3 ways: - both assets have the same value as the original - both assets become more valuable because more people can choose the paths they like (like ETH+ETC) - both assets become less valuable because the community is split In any case, with no action you bet on both just like you did before the split.

1

perfekt_disguize 7 hs ago

We will look back on this as a very important historic moment

3

BeerBellyFatAss Gentleman Yesterday

"The input being sought here will better inform the Commission and its operating divisions as the market evolves and potentially seeks to list new virtual currency based futures and derivatives products." - https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/federalregister121118.pdf

2

jredsama 6 hs ago

I was hoping to contribute, but I couldn't find the topic in the online portal.

1

BeerBellyFatAss Gentleman 5 hs ago

I haven't look myself. You could also contribute to a group forum here: https://twitter.com/ethhub_io/status/1072664614528266240?s=21 If I get a address for a personal submission, I'll link to it.

1

twigwam Lover Yesterday

Nice find! :)

3

BeerBellyFatAss Gentleman Yesterday

Thanks, saw you posted the article right after me. I beat ya to it this time. lol

3

twigwam Lover Yesterday

newzRacers! im also tweeting @EthereumNtw on twitter if you ever want to pull some off there Layr2.com is good too tokendaily.co also

3

BeerBellyFatAss Gentleman 11 hs ago

Yeah @EthereumNtw is pretty good. I'll have to check the other ones out.

1

twigwam Lover 9 hs ago

thx. You are one of my most excellent sources :)

2

6

4

3 2

RatPics Yesterday

I wonder what the point of this report even is? I imagine it's a rather lame attempt to reassure their stockholders.

0

halcyon Yesterday

1. It's a Taiwanese-American company 2. They are in business of selling hardware 3. They were falsely attacked through anonymous sources 4. They want to set things straight and soothe the minds of their prospective buyers 5. They hire a third party auditor to check their wares, after DHS, Amazon, Apple and others have already said that there were ZERO Chinese spy chips on Super Micro boards What else could they do? Just let the Bloomberg hit piece slide?

24

RatPics Yesterday

Every single entity involved with this issue would have the motivation to lie about the state of their security. I know for a fact that these customers do not audit hardware at the level capable of discovering these chips and side channel attacks, because most are complicit in allowing the NSA to be part of their security posture and that means ignoring certain types of irregularities. So it's no surprise when these intelligence tools get leaked into the public that we are seeing new types of attacks and attacks that are outside the scope of the NSA. They could sell what they advertise and actually maintain some semblance of control over their supply line. That's what they could do.

0

halcyon Yesterday

Fortunately, in criminology, an asymmetric motivation alone doesn't make anyone guilty. Also, if they get caught with the lie : big class-action suit. So I'm not even sold on the "motivation to lie" part. They have also a motivation to not to get sued from here to wazoo.

7

Keinichn Yesterday

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. *Not one* of these chips has *ever* been found. Bloomberg's "sources" were anonymous folks. That's it. No physical example, no pictures, no evidence of it out in the wild. *Nobody has found this chip that is supposedly in thousands of servers.*

11

yngvius11 Yesterday

They also have huge motivation not lie, because if it was discovered that the did lie they would be destroyed. They also didn’t just come out and say, “it’s not true” they said it’s blatantly false and demanded that Bloomberg put up proof. Amazon and Apple put their entire credibility on the line to take the stances that they did. Plus, the New York Times and Washington Post both said that they tried to corroborate Bloomberg’s reporting and found nothing to it. Edit: typo

12

zexterio Yesterday

We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong. Case close, Johnson.

0

halcyon Yesterday

So you are more willing to believe anonymous sources, two of which have afterwards refuted the Bloomberg article as fake, rather than an independent third party auditor? Riiiiighhhhht... I have a bridge to sell in Arizona, it's on sale for certified China haters.

10

cluedoubt Yesterday

As a certified and card carrying China hater, I think Bloomberg needs to step up and acknowledge this report, either print a retraction and apology or present their evidence. Anonymous sources with no proof don’t cut it anymore, especially when people’s livelihoods are at stake.

5

halcyon Yesterday

As an equal-opportunity criticiser, and not a hater of anyone, I agree. You make a claim, you back it with verifiable proof, otherwise it's just that - a claim.

3

yngvius11 Yesterday

It specifically says they brought in outside investigators.

0

yngvius11 Yesterday

It specifically says they brought in outside investigators.

19

RatPics Yesterday

And they tested controlled samples.

4

Keinichn Yesterday

In addition to none of the people who bought the servers, or independent researchers, ever finding one. It's almost like Bloomberg made the shit up.