Token Daily

Well that’s horrifying. Can someone explain to me what this second wave thing is? I mean... are they saying it’s going to get better and then get worse again? I don’t follow the logic, but I don’t know a fucking thing about infectious disease besides I hate bronchitis.

1

Popnursing 0 h ago

Am I the only one who read Maxine Waters tweet in a Disney Villan’s voice? Two thumbs up

1

MZ603 3 hs ago

Your submission has been removed because

Purely political posts and comments will be removed. Political discussions can easily come to dominate online discussions. Therefore we remove political posts and comments and lock comments on borderline posts. (More Information)

If you believe we made a mistake, please message the moderators.

1

Sekio-Vias 3 hs ago

Are the republicans trying to essentially suicide themselves? Cause that’s what they are doing..

1

nx85 :flag-cn: Canada 4 hs ago

What an astronomical gap in interdepartmental communication and oversight. Pence seems to be trying to the best of his abilities, or at least harder than Trump, but this clearly isn't his forte.

They'll likely have no choice but to divert all USAID stock back over to the US, which is terrible as there are 13 pre-approved shipments to other in-need countries in limbo now. Huge international incident. Jesus.

1

PurpleWhitley 4 hs ago

Not a Trump supporter but this seems pretty reasonable.

Beyond the fuck up of not having an organized response and there being some crossed wires, there really isn’t much beyond a normal Trump scandal or even just two teams not talking with people.

It seemed like they are trying to bank goodwill with foreign countries and two teams thought the other was accounting for domestic needs.

Trump’s administration is incompetent and a clusterfuck. What’s new.

1

bunnyjenkins 1 h ago

It MIGHT seem reasonable if Team Trump had not spent the last 3 years burning down all the connections we had with other countries, our allies, NATO, and the UN. So No, it does not seem very reasonable to me. It seems panicked and irrational.

1

HippyDM 1 h ago

We HAD an office that coordinated aid and supplies for worldwide pandemics. tRump's team dismantled that office, I believe in '18. You're exactly right, one preventable, incompetent, clusterfuck after another

1

AutoModerator 4 hs ago

Your post was automatically removed for being about the coronavirus. We are allowing significant news stories as their own threads; if you think your article qualifies as major news, please message the mod team. If it does not, please use the update thread here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

privatepersons 4 hs ago

Where is the shadow task force master? Where is Jared? Ivanka? How do these two always avoid scrutiny?

1

bestbeforeMar91 4 hs ago

They mostly come at night...mostly

1

prampsler 6 hs ago

Last week, a Trump administration official working to secure much-needed protective gear for doctors and nurses in the United States had a startling encounter with counterparts in Thailand.

The official asked the Thais for help—only to be informed by the puzzled voices on the other side of the line that a U.S. shipment of the same supplies, the second of two so far, was already on its way to Bangkok.

1

nheljar_makotu 5 hs ago

we are so fucked

1

aintnocoffeeshop 2 hs ago

Republicans do not believe in the efficacy of government; and every time they govern they are proven right.

1

hereagain1011 6 hs ago

This administration has so much blood on their hands.

1

PoliticsModeratorBot 6 hs ago

Hi prampsler. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, your submission has been removed for the following reason:

Already Submitted: This article has been submitted to /r/politics within the last three days:

https://redd.it/fsoo9t

I'm a bot and sometimes I make mistakes. If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/prampsler&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this submission.)

1

prampsler 6 hs ago

Last week, a Trump administration official working to secure much-needed protective gear for doctors and nurses in the United States had a startling encounter with counterparts in Thailand.

The official asked the Thais for help—only to be informed by the puzzled voices on the other side of the line that a U.S. shipment of the same supplies, the second of two so far, was already on its way to Bangkok.

1

AutoModerator 6 hs ago

As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to whitelist and outlet criteria.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Nano_Burger :flag-va: Virginia 6 hs ago

“Trump, you incompetent idiot! You sent 18 tons of PPE to China early but ignored warnings & called COVID19 concerns a hoax,” Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) tweeted on Monday, referring to 17.8 tons of medical supplies—including masks, gowns, gauze, and respirators—the U.S. delivered in February to help with the outbreak in China. “You’ve endangered doctors, nurses, aids [sic], orderlies, & janitors -- all risking their lives to save ours. Pray 4 forgiveness for the harm that you’re causing!”

1

nx85 :flag-cn: Canada 4 hs ago

The 17.8 ton shipment to China was part of a global effort that happened in early February to try slowing down the rate of spread. Canada sent the same amount. That's not really an issue IMO, everyone had to do what was best for the world at the time. If she wants to tweet about aid STILL going out right now, that's a different story. This is a huge mess.

1

StarInTheMoon 3 hs ago

I think the issue is that if you're (symbolically) shipping 18 tons of gear to deal with a virulent disease, you might not want to downplay the risk at home and make sure you're well stocked up yourself.

1

Popnursing 0 h ago

I’m confused- all I keep hearing is we can’t make N95s here because all the material is in China. Why would we be sending PPE TO China where it’s made? Not to mention masks have been a part of their social culture for decades. China legit had a ton of issues with their Covid outbreak but a shortage of PPE was NOT one of them.

1

DingDongDooDoo 4 hs ago

The antichrist doesn't pray for forgiveness.

1

theslothening 6 hs ago

This is a must read article that fully explains just how much of a clusterfuck this whole thing has become. We are literally selling and/or giving away all our PPE to other countries while our healthcare workers can't get any.

1

clover_408 0 h ago

America last I guess.

1

paddleme 3 hs ago

Something the pandemic response team might have been able to coordinate? Bolton is an idiot. How can you call it streamlining when it failed completely?

1

noobditt 3 hs ago

\#fustercluck

1

milqi :flag-ny: New York 6 hs ago

And this is why Trump accused hospitals of selling their own supplies the other day. His accusations are projection.

1

Hayley_hayys 6 hs ago

Bingo!! Nailed it

1

CarmineFields 6 hs ago

So they’re risking their lives and being accused of theft!

1

Tweakers 4 hs ago

Repugnant-cans can do nothing else.

1

FetcherLeVache :flag-cn: Canada 6 hs ago

Crossed wires would only confuse our allies, they worried, or worse—offend them.

Pretty sure that ship has sailed.

1

Hayley_hayys 6 hs ago

It’s still sailing

1

itshurleytime :flag-wi: Wisconsin 4 hs ago

And all the sailors have the virus.

1

djlawrence3557 6 hs ago

The gentlemen have just tuned their violins though

1

spam-doctor 6 hs ago

Pence is gonna get replaced by Nikki Haley, won't he

1

jonathanswerdloff 6 hs ago

Yes. Then things will get worse.

1

wazurobi 6 hs ago

Nah. He knows how to play the game. Every other sentence starts with "Under the president's direction..."

1

mountainOlard 5 hs ago

Oh shit haha

1

El_capitaine 6 hs ago

Seems like the adult thing to do

1

NoSatellite 6 hs ago

Coordinating the sale of much needed PPE to foreign countries in the midst of the current outbreak is the least adult thing I can think of.

1

XanaxIsMyCopilot 6 hs ago

But it’s the most republican

1

Hayley_hayys 6 hs ago

Oh God, I hate how true that statement is.

1

AutoModerator 6 hs ago

As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to whitelist and outlet criteria.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

2

1 2 2

7 2

the_angry_empath 2 hs ago

That's my brother in Central MA! Quarantined at work. Nuts, but I'm really proud of him.

1

the-lone-squid 7 hs ago

God, that would be freaking awful.

There was a rumor that they are planning that at my work. I told them I would quit. I live alone, i don't need to live at work

2

boyu_zh 9 hs ago

It should not be that bad.

If you consider someone's work is 'essential,' you should raise their salary, cover their medical expense, give them sick leave, provide PPE. If these could be done, people love to work. The virus is not our problem, the greedy companies are.

12

jkgisguy 10 hs ago

50% rotating shift utility worker here isolating at home when not at work, what we need is for the general public to actually have common sense and do the same when they don’t absolutely have to.

71

Darknight77777 5 hs ago

Thank you for your hard work

1

TheRealSpankyJohnson 7 hs ago

You are absolutely crucial to the wheels not flying off of this crazy train. Stay safe and focused.

7

Tearsonbluedustjckt 10 hs ago

Thank you for what you do

16

jkgisguy 9 hs ago

Thank you for the thanks but unnecessary, love the job and the folks I work with are basically family. We’ve luckily gone down to only emergency work for now so that helps lighten the load but honestly can make for kind of boring days.

13

Caminando_ 8 hs ago

Bro - what you do keeps our lights on. It's important work.

12

ZeroDesert91 10 hs ago

Last month when this all began to gain traction I had joked about the virus spreading so much that it knocks out the power grid, much like Revolution. Sad to say that without the protective measures the grid workers are taking, we very well could fall into a situation like that.

6

finster_baby 10 hs ago

This is exactly why we need widespread antibody testing, get those people back in the workforce with essential jobs.

27

CaiusRemus 10 hs ago

I suggested both these things at my essential utility workplace but I’m just a lowly laborer so no one will listen. I questioned why the most essential and critical staff were not being sent home to isolate in case of an emergency or large scale outbreak. I also said we need antibody testing on a large scale so it can be determined who use safe to continue or go back to work.

10

keepsake4 10 hs ago

The antibody tests are not widely available yet. But they will be soon, according to epidemiologists. Prof. Neil Ferguson said "days, not weeks" although that was days ago.

5

5030000000 10 hs ago

I'm thinking the plan is to manage this first way, stop people from dying in mass, stay home, start a massive testing campaign.

4

keepsake4 10 hs ago

Do you believe that non-essential workers / people who have a positive antibody test, should be allowed to break lockdown laws?

5

5030000000 9 hs ago

It'd be nice to know if people are immune after recovering, and for how long. I've heard everything from 3 months to 12 years. But I don't see what choice we have either way. We can't all stay holed up forever right?

3

keepsake4 9 hs ago

The only study is in rhesus macaques, which showed immunity after being deliberately infected twice, with a couple of weeks in between. > We can't all stay holed up forever right? So are you happy to take the 1 in 50 or 1 in 500 chance of death, to go back to 2019?

2

5030000000 9 hs ago

Not happy to, no, but I don't see much choice. I've seen other articles that mention you might avoid a worse infection by starting with a small viral load. So maybe light exposure is a way to build immunity? I have no idea.

1

claire_resurgent 9 hs ago

It's more like 1 in 3000 for healthy people 30 or younger. I would gladly take that chance. (Again. I didn't have a choice.)

1

keepsake4 10 hs ago

I'm fine with widespread antibody testing. But it's critical that negative-antibody workers are not discriminated against. And given full PPE. And that positive-antibody people are not allowed to flout lockdown laws.

1

HoldOnforDearLove 10 hs ago

Explain that last part, please. Why should they comply with lockdown laws? Shouldn't they be exempt?

3

keepsake4 10 hs ago

Do you like going down rabbit holes? [Come with us.](https://old.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/frwohi/immunity_passports_could_speed_up_return_to_work/)

2

HoldOnforDearLove 1 h ago

Good thinking. We'll see how things play out. I'll probably be one of the lockdowners holding out. Weak point being my school age kids. Got some option for that though. Meanwhile I'm still optimistic for the chances of antivirals or vaccines, but may have to settle for non overwhelmed well trained healthcare which is better than what we have now.

1

Mythromize 10 hs ago

First we hear about top generals and nuclear scientists moving to bunkers, and now electrical grid workers as well...what are we not being told? Resident Evil about to become reality?

7

ibonek_naw_ibo 10 hs ago

FTWD season 1

1

Hard_at_it 10 hs ago

That there's a very thin veneer of lies keeping most people believing that this is only a short-term problem.

11

mobile_website_25323 3 hs ago

This is going to be a problem until a vaccine is ready. so 2 years minimum.

1

claire_resurgent 9 hs ago

The virus has been spreading far too quickly for it to be a long-term problem. Either we can develop immunity like we have to every other respiratory virus and we get to continue being a species. Or we can't: vaccines won't save us either and this is a very strange and improbable end.

1

Hard_at_it 9 hs ago

>The virus has been spreading far too quickly for it to be a long-term problem. > >Either we can develop immunity like we have to every other respiratory virus and we get to continue being a species. Or we can't: vaccines won't save us either and this is a very strange and improbable end. it can be a long-term problem what happens with all these medical personnel start dropping we lose doctors that's a lot of knowledge loss that'll take years to regain.

1

2

2 2

2

4 2

2

6 2

2

3

25 3 4

Elliecute2020 4 hs ago

Most of the US’s count does too, since you can’t get a test if you don’t have symptoms, unless you are rich and famous

2

RealFunction 9 hs ago

never trust the ccp

0

btek 9 hs ago

"In other news: logically and critically speaking you can't trust news from a communist country especially china in a time of global crisis, with everything to loose". Need I refer you to any one of the countless examples of communist propaganda of past or present? How about one you'll certainly be familiar with: the recent movie (show?) Titled: Chernobyl..

1

chicagoahu Yesterday

China's official Covid-19 counts are 10-20 times under reported.

4

WilliamLeeFightingIB Yesterday

I love how you tweaked the title to make it sound negative. You could also say "China to start reporting number of asymptomatic cases from April 1st". Most countries at this point are not testing asymptomatic for the lack of resources. The US for example refuses to test one if one is asymptomatic and does not have contact history with a confirmed infected.

0

alphanumericsheeppig 2 hs ago

This is not a testing resources issue. These are people who are being tested, are testing positive, but are being excluded from the reported numbers. Most countries are testing asymptotic people if they have been in close contact with another positive case or have travelled. If they test positive, most countries are rooting them. China, until now, was not. That is deliberately dishonest.

2

Samic_OWillie Yesterday

Probably also excludes a fair amount with symptoms.

7

DNAhelicase Moderator Yesterday

Your submission has been removed because

Reposts will be removed. Reposts also cover new posts containing only information that has already been posted. (More Information)

If you believe we made a mistake, please message the moderators.

1

-Jango- Yesterday

This definitely isn't new information. I thought I read there were an estimated 43,000 asymptomatic people who tested positive which weren't included in China's total number of cases.

Edit: here's the article I saw

1

Luminya1 Yesterday

Frankly I think all of the numbers that come out of China are suspect.

1

Vedro1 Yesterday

There is no country testing people with no symptoms apart from medics and police. So technically every person is nesting all sorts of viruses and bacterias but if the person is not ill it is not a medical case.

11

Processtour 9 hs ago

[Not true, Iceland has tested its citizens with or without symptoms](https://www.google.com/amp/s/fortune.com/2020/03/27/coronavirus-testing-us-iceland-cdc-trump-decode-covid-19-tests/amp/)

8

BassmanBiff Yesterday

Weren't some countries doing random sampling? Norway planned to at some point, and I thought Seoul did as well, if not all of SK.

2

DaBIGmeow888 Yesterday

The 'false positive paradox' means if you test a large number of people, you will get many false positives. No test has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Not reporting asymptomatic patients with positive results would be a way correct for false-positive test results.

This has to do with the complexities of specificity/sensitivity during mass-testing of population.

2

StartingToLoveIMSA Yesterday

result....cases up, death rate down

3

coronavirus_202020 Yesterday

Maybe not...when they truthfully report the extra 90% fatalities

0

StartingToLoveIMSA 11 hs ago

hmm....good point

2

xdturtles Yesterday

Not a surprise

16

goldenpisces Yesterday

The exclusion of asymptomatic cases from confirmed cases wasn't new.

Quite a number of news outlets reported it early Feb., NYT article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/world/asia/china-coronavirus-cases.html

There were also scientific discussions on it, Nature article:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00434-5

Google "china asymptomatic case" and use options under "tools" to restrict the date range to February.

There were outrages in this sub then as well, but Reddit search function is piss poor I am going to waste time digging them out.

6

licxtfls Yesterday

Asymptomatic carriers have the virus, but DO NOT have the disease. Just like not every HIV positive people has AIDS. Having AIDS means showing symptoms. So there’s nothing wrong with not including asymptomatic carriers as confirmed cases of COVID-19. What’s important is whether they are tested, identified, traced and quarantined. In China’s case, they are. Come April when their number gets reported, I’m sure it’s going to be in an different category than confirmed cases.

5

mcwilg Yesterday

We all know China was not reporting the full numbers, given the rate of transmission and population density i'st safe to say their rates were over a million at least. They fiddled the numbers with the slightest of tweaks.

But they played the game well, they are no longer the 'sick man' of the world. That prize is now the privilege of America and Donald Trump. Now watch the pressure to them to do the same.

0

_-neptune Yesterday

The asymptomatic cases were not included in the total, okay. That much we knew, CCDC told us as much (although they changed their criteria more than a few times).

What I do not understand is: If they got tested and quarantined and, as we know, strictly surveilled to stay there - how can nobody find out how much the actual total is and just release those numbers?

This really bites my ass, actually, because those numbers have such high value for the scientific analysis and thus for how other countries handle this outbreak.

1

AutoModerator BOT Yesterday

Hi gummybronco. Your submission from wsj.com was removed for being behind a paywall. Articles posted to /r/worldnews must be accessible to the common redditor. Please use another source. If the article is actually accessible when clicking the reddit link, please let us know.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

viktorbir Yesterday

When you are a carrier of influenzavirus but you don't have the flu symptoms, do you count yourself as having the flu? No, me neither.

0

MisterSlosh Yesterday

Those numbers still need to be counted because asymptomatic carriers can and often do spread the infection to people that will develop symptoms. It's not a count of sick people, it's needed to track the rate and locations of expansion.

7

BeardedOscar Yesterday

Exactly! If you are not tested and never know, why would it matter then. Just for having that data aside you obviously weren't part of the problem.

0

Notalentass Yesterday

These are people who tested positive but show no symptoms. They're not random folks - they are carriers of the disease. That's confirmed, not speculation.

7

BeardedOscar Yesterday

I've read conflicting data which there seems to be a lot of. People are certainly more likely to infect others inside their own home but asymptomatic carriers which any direct physical contact to a random person are not infectious as they are made out to be. This not advocating a return to normalcy just stating what I've read.

0

greg_jenningz Yesterday

How do you exclude people from a disease report who literally have the disease? Lmao GG China

Chinese shills are out. Lordy

0

DaBIGmeow888 Yesterday

That's because it's a false-positive result , no diagnostic lab test has 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. If you adopt a mass-testing of general public, strategy, you are bound to have large numbers of false-positive results, due to tests not being 100% accurate and due to law-of-large numbers.

2

greg_jenningz Yesterday

Reporting-wise.. that not the correct thing to do. Especially in a pandemic. That's like over-promising and under-delivering.

1

lordrunningclam Yesterday

To be fair, I think everyone's coronavirus count excludes infected people with no symptoms. Including and perhaps especially the US since there is very little testing here and they only test the symptomatic.

33

eidoK1 Yesterday

I think the difference is that China is excluding asymptomatic people who *have* tested positive. As far as I know, nobody else is doing that. And there isn't any reason I can think of apart from artificially lowering your numbers. Testing asymptomatic people is a supply/response issue; not reporting asymptomatic people who have tested positive is a concern with transparency.

37

NotMyRealFaceBook 1 h ago

We’re talking about a number (1.5k asymptomatic cases) that represent ~2% of the 82k cases reported in China. I too hate CPC public data policies, but this specific instance doesn’t seem important enough to be calculated / dishonest. All that said, it’s impossible to trust any numbers from the CPC. So why bother

1

Saikbran Yesterday

Tell them to count the deaths from outside hospitals as well!

0

Mister_Met Yesterday

Oh sure, now they’ll start reporting real numbers

0

DaBIGmeow888 Yesterday

That's because it's a false-positive result , no diagnostic lab test has 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. If you adopt a mass-testing of general public, strategy, you are bound to have large numbers of false-positive results, due to tests not being 100% accurate and due to law-of-large numbers.

3

kbh004 Yesterday

You really think we can trust any numbers coming from the CCP??

0

DaBIGmeow888 Yesterday

That's because it's a false-positive result , no diagnostic lab test has 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. If you adopt a mass-testing of general public, strategy, you are bound to have large numbers of false-positive results, due to tests not being 100% accurate and due to law-of-large numbers.

3

SoulWager Yesterday

Nope.

0

Hafomeng Yesterday

The policy of not including asymptomatic people has been official policy since Feb. 7th. It wasn't a secret or anything.

136

hizhao1 Yesterday

Shhh.. we are trying to blame here so we can shift the anger of our people to someone else

16

Gobertvirus Yesterday

Americans are still using it to accuse China of making up datas, actually they are not even going that far when china have tested a million times at least.

10

LaughingKum Yesterday

Actually those two names have different meanings legally, especially when the guy goes around and spread virus.

1

ArcherPig Yesterday

It was still a stupid policy nonetheless.

0

DaBIGmeow888 Yesterday

That's because it's a false-positive result , no diagnostic lab test has 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. If you adopt a mass-testing of general public, strategy, you are bound to have large numbers of false-positive results, due to tests not being 100% accurate and due to law-of-large numbers.

2

Hafomeng Yesterday

Why? China is one of the only countries in the world that tests all close contacts and possible infected people. In early February, it wasn't clear whether these asymptomatic people were false positives or actual infections, so they were reported separately. As many others have pointed out, almost every other country requires patients to show symptoms before allowing a test, so it's not as if this skews China's numbers down, either.

30

sheevit Yesterday

Where’d you read that? I’m just trying to find some info on chinese practices

2

ArcherPig Yesterday

It gives people a false sense of security by saying “0 new domestic cases reported”, when in reality there are asymptomatic carriers out and about. It also gives local government officials an out to hide potential new cases, in an attempt to get people back to work and avoid political consequences. It wouldn’t be a big issue if these asymptomatic cases were isolated and monitored, but this has not been strictly enforced and was the direct cause of new domestic cases popping up in China. I couldn’t care less about the “numbers” - this isn’t a competition to see which country is the shittiest in this pandemic. The concern is always to do what is right and necessary to control the spread, and for China specifically, to avoid/delay the second wave.

0

opera207 Yesterday

I think you are the only one that fool enough to think that others wouldn’t think about to quarantine asymptomatic cases.

1

Hafomeng Yesterday

> It gives people a false sense of security by saying “0 new domestic cases reported”, when in reality there are asymptomatic carriers out and about. This is wrong. These asymptomatic cases almost exclusively come from medical workers and others who have had close contact. They are not "out and about", they are quarantined and separated from the general population.

7

ArcherPig Yesterday

I’m sure you’ve read about the new domestic case in Henan from a couple days ago. Yes, they are supposed to be quarantined and isolated, but the reality is that the policy isn’t strictly enforced. By not reporting such cases, local government officials have the inclination to sweep things under the rug and pretend new positive tests don’t exist. Asymptomatic cases who test positive should absolutely be reported for transparency.

1

Hafomeng Yesterday

And they will be reported soon. My original post is just pointing out that there hasn't been a "coverup", but instead that this policy was publicly stated.

5

mofadi3247 Yesterday

not testing people isn't the same as testing them and hiding the results edit: heh, found some of the CCP downvote bots

0

AvalancheZ250 Yesterday

The number of asymptomatic but positive carriers would have been recorded. Now they’ll just add those figures to the “infected” tally, so in the end we’ll see the total numbers anyway.

9

mofadi3247 Yesterday

cool? Not sure what that has to do with the fact that hiding results is not the same as not having any results.

1

farm-worker Yesterday

What's more, there are 1541 asymptomatic patients in China until March 30.

23