Mocking the father of the EVM as if you have contributed anything meaningful to this space... Show some respect for @greg_colvin . His work has been coopted by many projects, including RSK. https://t.co/m0IM8cXarh
Greg Colvin is awesome and the closest we will ever get to a wizard. However I have to disagree here. It's fine for devs to get to have a chat without armies of trolls and FUD crashing down every time anything is said about casper, sharding, scaling, or whatever else. If/when the EIPs are merged, people will be free to agree/disagree and run the consensus they choose. There is literally nothing wrong with this.
Additionally, the Fellowship is not a "developer group". We have been discussing long and hard about accessibility to our group, and one of the core issues is to remove the "developer only" label, as it is an open forum for discussions.
Such discussions are also not only about code. We have education rings, and various other proposals. Thanks Rachel for correcting that bit, and Adriana, the piece is indeed great but the FEM labelling is not ideal.