Stay up to date on all things crypto and blockchain
Token Daily is a place to discover trending news and products in crypto and blockchain.
Source: washingtonpost.com ·
Huge spending increase and sharp falloff in revenue led to the large gap. The deficit in past nine months has breached $2.7 trillion.
CZ - @cz_binance
6 months ago
RT @APompliano: The US government is going to have to bail out the US government eventually https://t.co/W2JVF2fFgM
58
407
Pomp - @APompliano
6 months ago
The US government is going to have to bail out the US government eventually https://t.co/W2JVF2fFgM
34
259
Keiser Report - @KeiserReport
6 months ago
RT @edwardnh: U.S. budget deficit shattered one-month record in June, as spending outpaced revenue by $864 billion https://t.co/fPWHEEpEHP
10
12
stephenehorn
6 months ago
And yet state and local jurisdictions are clamoring for federal funds to shore up their own deficits
1
AGuineapigs
6 months ago
Also tax cuts without spending cuts during economic prosperity. Member when it was sold to everyone that the economy was going to do so well it was going to pay for the tax cuts to the 1%. Well, it didnt.
2
correspondences
6 months ago
I don’t know much about economics, but Wikipedia tells me that the GDP for the entire country is $21.4 trillion. This deficit, if continued at this rate over a year, would be $10.4 trillion. If almost half of our GDP is based on deficit spending, shouldn’t that lead to monetary collapse or hyperinflation or something bad like that?
2
Mr_Hassel
6 months ago
The "libertarian" president they called him. The party of "fiscal responsibility". Everytime they take office the deficit EXPLODES. I have no idea how people keep believing this shit.
22
windershinwishes
6 months ago
What does the deficit have to do with libertarianism? Does money take away your liberty?
0
SeamlessR
6 months ago
They don't believe it. They just believe people take them seriously when they say they believe it.
And people do take them seriously. Because more people than not are too stupid to adequately protect themselves from targeted gaslighting.
6
PoliticsModeratorBot
6 months ago
Hi TheJedibugs. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, your submission has been removed for the following reason:
- Already Submitted: This article has been submitted to /r/politics within the last three days:
I'm a bot and sometimes I make mistakes. If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/TheJedibugs&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this submission.)
1
TheJedibugs
:flag-ga: Georgia 6 months ago
Hey, where all my “fiscal responsibility” republicans at??
3
ThinkOption1
6 months ago
They don't exist any more. I no longer believe in fiscal conservatism because austerity solves nothing.
0
AutoModerator
6 months ago
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to whitelist and outlet criteria.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
WholeGrainMustard
:flag-nj: New Jersey 6 months ago
Don’t worry if Biden wins, the GOP will care about the deficit in November.
1
klosnj11
6 months ago
I would be fine with this if during better times (last three years) we underspent the budget and created a warchest for spending during things like pandemics or mass unrest. But that never happens. They go from spending more during times of trouble to spending even more when the trouble is over.
21
FrontAppeal0
6 months ago
Conservatives love the idea of a payroll tax holiday but refuse to contemplate a cut in entitlement spending.
Similarly, a War Tax to fund the Pentagon is right out. Not the spending of course, just the paying for it.
Same reason they fight over the Debt Ceiling bill but not the appropriations budget.
5
ToXiC_Af_U_WeAk
Somewhere between libright and libleft and authrig 6 months ago
that's pretty ironic, considering how bad social security, insurance etc. are in the USA compared to other countries. sounds like mismanagement to me...
1
newbrevity
6 months ago
Yup everyone worried about social programs that help people and could elevate society then have no problem with the military industrial complex
13
LazyRockMan
Liberterian Conservative 6 months ago
Most people have issues with the military tf?
Even most republicans ik agree that military spending has to be seriously evaluated because of how insanely fucking wastefully
(and that’s the more conservative Republicans) the military handles all of its money.
1
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
I agree. I believe in social safety nets because the alternatives have proved to be absolutely cruel. Plus even when you strive to have a complete free market solution to those problems, someone else always ends up picking up the slack while the wrongdoers pocket the difference. But there are too many pigs at the trough.
The amount we pay for our military is inexcusable because so much of it is waste and corruption. The US military is also one of the largest polluters in the world (which has negative effects up and down the chain).
7
KikkomanSauce
6 months ago
On January 21, 2021, if, god willing, Biden wins, Fox, OAN, Newsmax, etc. will all being doing wall to wall coverage of how awful our national debt is, and blame "the left" for the problem.
And angry GOPers are going to eat that shit up, and take to the streets. Again.
6
SenorBurns
6 months ago
I'm tired of the fiscally irresponsible GOP. The Republicans are fat cats lighting their cigars with our hard earned tax dollars.
Then they send piles of our money to religious schools while our public schools languish.
Republicans start expensive overseas wars in countries that never attacked us. Why? So they can line the pockets of their defense contractor buddies. Meanwhile, our soldiers put in harms way barely scrape by, and our veterans care is underfunded.
Vote out all the fat cats.
3
gatechthrowaway1873
It's not enough to not be a communist, we must be 6 months ago
Have to open he economy up and stop giving welfare to individuals and businesses.
0
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
You think shutting down the whole economy is "literally the smallest factor"?
0
GreyInkling
6 months ago
We're talking about the deficit here. Compared to the other spending they've been racking up and the bailouts, the stimulus to the economy itself was peanuts.
1
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
Why are you answering my question about the negative tax revenue impacts of shutting down the economy with a statement about significance of stimulus checks on the deficit.
0
slfiftyfifty
6 months ago
Clearly, this is a non-issue... until a democrat is in charge. Then we have to get this wreckless tax and spend problem under control immediately. Someone has to be the adult in the room and tell the democrats they cant spend money they don't have.
1
vasilenko93
6 months ago
That is insanity. Debt is future spending brought forward. We are talking so much wealth from the future it’s criminal.
30
FrontAppeal0
6 months ago
> Debt is future spending brought forward.
It's all paper promises. Just numbers on ledgers being moved around to justify current consumption levels.
What we're seeing with increasing clarity is that automation renders a great deal of human labor redundant. Full employment is only possible through make-work projects and excess waste production.
The debt we're building up is just a way of convincing people who aren't needed in the business process to stay employed doing meaningless labors.
4
windershinwishes
6 months ago
No, sovereign debt it is inventing liquidity. No one is going to come repossesses America.
2
me_too_999
6 months ago
They already did.
Look at the amount of land, and commercial property owned by foreigners, and foreign countries bought, and paid for with US dollars.
Our grandparents built this country, but we no longer own it.
2
me_too_999
6 months ago
I hope you still feel that way when a bank in Europe forecloses on your house.
2
me_too_999
6 months ago
They've been purchased by international corporations.
I concerned you don't see the danger of this.
1
fkneneu
Liberal in European sense 6 months ago
Because international corporations are worse than american corporations?
1
me_too_999
6 months ago
https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/private-banks-spurious-quotation
1
FreeHongKongDingDong
Vaccination Is Theft 6 months ago
"Deficits Don't Matter"
~ Dick Cheney, 2002
11
SwingingOnATire
6 months ago
"I voted for fiscally responsible republicans because libtards want to steal my guns" - Libertarians every election
7
SwankeyDankey
6 months ago
Well now, I doubt every single libertarian thinks that way considering I don't. You'd have to not be paying attention if you're looking at the White House and thinking "fiscally responsible". It sounds more like you are imitating Republicans.
0
SwankeyDankey
6 months ago
Most libertarians on hear are pushing for Jo. There is post after post pointing out Trump as an authoritarian. Yes, there is a portion that lean right. There is also a portion that lean left and some that vote purely libertarian every 4 years. I know there are some "libertarians" out there that are just Republicans in disguise. This bothers me but it is what it is. No true libertarian would vote for Trump.
0
mattyoclock
6 months ago
and sadly post after post accusing them of not being libertarians, but instead "tankies" for not wanting to have an authoritarian for president.
1
PoliticsModeratorBot
6 months ago
Hi PraiseBeToAthena. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Already Submitted: This article has already been submitted to /r/politics.
If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/PraiseBeToAthena&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission]%28/r/politics/comments/hqkb2g/us_budget_deficit_shattered_onemonth_record_in/?context%3D10000%29)
1
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
As we all know you are just a confused leftist how can you make these claims while we know that Democrats:
* Support endless shutdowns which drastically reduce tax revenues present AND future
* Support bigger stimulus checks and likely want another round
The truth is that both parties in DC ultimately support spending/deficit. Why pretend the deficit is partisan?
0
AGuineapigs
6 months ago
Like clockwork with you guys. Same tired both sides song. Are we only allowed to criticize the left? Even with majority republican rule? How does that work?
Also, doesn't the buck stop somewhere. I mean, Republicans didn't vote for the crazy spending then non of it would've passed. It's all signed off by Republicans. The same ones who say they are small government conservatives.
0
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
The Republicans are shit in general and that's the difference between me and you. In your mind the Democrats for some reason always get a pass.
>The same ones who say they are small government conservatives
I guess being hypocritical is popular these days. Like you pretending to be mad about the deficit while supporting Democrats.
0
AGuineapigs
6 months ago
Your name has TDS in the title. You're a republican pretending to be a libertarian.
Small government republicans deserve blame but you swoop in and defend them.
I've never advocated for democrats. I think they are shit.
1
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
I have TDS in my name as Reddit as a whole suffers greatly from the disease, yourself included. I'm not pretending to be shit and I say what I mean.
You on the other hand post left-wing propaganda all the time. If you don't actually like the Democrats you are one confused individual because you are assisting their agenda and thus rise to power.
1
AGuineapigs
6 months ago
Lol, trump supporting republican in the libertarian sub... talk about being confused.
0
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
I'm not a "Trump supporting Republican". I'm a "Democrat* hating Libertarian" Trump just happens to be our only weapon against their destructive pursuit of power. There are only a few Republicans I even approve of. The rest of them are no better than the lying cheating Democrats. And the Democrats get away with mass deception just because the media gladly does the propaganda work for them. Just look how disoriented it has your brain. A self-proclaimed Libertarian carrying water for the Democrats. If you really are a Libertarian I suggest you wake up from the trance.
**Edit:* **I want to clarify by "Democrat" I'm referring to politicians and media. I have nothing against brainwashed citizenry and wish to help them see the truth what their party has become. **
1
AGuineapigs
6 months ago
Hahahaha, oh man. This is too good. Thanks for the laugh this morning.
Supporting an authoritarian to own the libs. I love it.
0
TDS_Consultant2
6 months ago
I'd prefer "libs" wake up from the trance, remember what they used to believe in, and join in the fight to preserve this country from hostile takeover by the authoritarian far-left. You should only be laughing if you like the idea of living under authoritarian leftists. If you're a real libertarian I strongly suggest turning off the propaganda, research original sources with the last step pulling your head out of your ass before the brain damage is permanent.
1
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Both parties supported the CARE act.
0
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Good lord. It's like half the people on this sub have a learning disability.
0
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
So why do you give one party a pass?
0
SeamlessR
6 months ago
Because one party wants it, says they want it, and act like they want it.
And the other party says they don't want it, act like they don't want it, but do it anyway.
Name the parties.
11
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
>And the other party says they don't want it, act like they don't want it, but do it anyway.
The bill the democrats put forward would have been much worse. It included even more costs, even less related to the direct affects of covid, and would have increased the debt even more.
If your point here was that democrats tend to be less fiscally responsible then republicans, you might have made it.
0
SeamlessR
6 months ago
That is the point, yes. Democrats don't hide that's what they want.
Republicans act like they want to be responsible, say we should be responsible, and then act even MORE irresponsibly than the Democrats could ever have dared approach.
You don't want what democrats are selling, totally fine.
You do want what republicans are selling, also totally fine. The problem is that republicans are lying to you about what they're selling. The democrats might be too but who cares? Presumably you voted republicans in to do the thing republicans said they wanted to do.
But they didn't. Because they are liars. And they used you: the lied to.
10
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
> Democrats don't hide that's what they want.
Their use of the term "free" to mean "borrow" seems to suggest otherwise.
0
SeamlessR
6 months ago
You're not wrong, but you can at least figure that out by looking at the actual proposals they put forward where the actual cost is available and where it goes.
Republicans literally hid where monumental emergency spending went. While also spending their whole careers railing against spending and pretending to care about transparency.
Ultimately you can point towards the dems and say they're bad, but every single reason and why you could come up with also exists within the republican party. Which is a problem when republicans literal whole platform is "not that, not what the dems are doing, what they're doing? We'll do something else". Never mind that they'll just, you know, do the same thing. But with less giving a shit about anything at all.
6
Mist_Rising
NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods 6 months ago
>You're not wrong
He is wrong. When they talk about free, they dont mean to everyone. Everyone with a brain knows it, but because actually attacking the idea is impossible, they attack the wording.
Anyone who looks at democratic bills knows this. The "free healthcare" has higher taxes to offset. Something those same people compaining about free will inevitable dig up because when its advantageous.
2
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
>You're not wrong, but you can at least figure that out by looking at the actual proposals they put forward where the actual cost is available and where it goes.
Like New Green Deal, which includes zero consideration of costs? Or Bernie's plan, which counts your money as government money. Or Warren's plan, which is basically "rich will pay for everything don't worry"?
0
C0MMANDERD4TA
6 months ago
Because democrats pay down the deficit when in power? Clinton ran a surplus, bush turned it into a 1.2 trillion deficit, which obama reduced to 400 billion, and trump has been blowing it up over a trillion despite a cushy economy his firsf 3 years
https://www.msnbc.com/sites/msnbc/files/styles/ratio--1_91-1--1200x630/public/9.13.19.png?itok=K8ZmorXA
10
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Obama nearly doubled the federal debt, borrowing far more than Bush in total.
0
C0MMANDERD4TA
6 months ago
because he inherited a massive recession and 2 wars. its like lighting the house on fire before you move out, then blaming the next guy for the fire damage
i see other redditors already brought this up and you are just straight ignoring it, so you do you
5
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Nope. He didn't have to pass the bailout. He didn't have to stay in those wars. He didn't have to increase social spending.
0
Mist_Rising
NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods 6 months ago
>He didn't have to pass the bailout
Busy signed the first round, dude. 800b or so.
3
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
Because he put the Afghan and Iraq War on the budget finally. Bush went his whole administration without offially paying for a single dollar of the War on Terror. It didn’t even count against the deficit until the Congress voted to do so in 2009.
12
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
None of this changes the fact that the federal debt nearly double under his presidency.
0
Mist_Rising
NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods 6 months ago
So if Congress passed a bill in 2010, then said you nslinkns24 were to take all credit for the problem later, that's on you?
Don't be disengenious.
2
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Your sentence is incoherent
0
windershinwishes
6 months ago
And what about the mountain of stimulus spending that occurred in the immediate months after his inauguration, which was in response to a financial crisis that built up and exploded during Bush’s administration?
5
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
Like I said, both parties are responsible for driving up the US debt. Jesus. Do you people read?
1
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
Apparently you don’t agree adding two wars to the national debt would increase it?
8
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
That doesn't follow, no.
0
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
Because one party claims to hate socialism yet ends up solving all their major problems with socialism?
Being idealistic but misguided is one sin, but being complete hypocrites for decades is inexcusable.
5
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
I'm less concerned with purity of their intentions than the soundness of their policies
1
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
Which means you don’t really stand for anything.
If you’re willing to support and cuddle up to unethical people to get what you want (say a measly $2000 in a tax cut), I don’t know what else to tell you other than your integrity is able to be put on hold for a cheap price.
3
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
>Which means you don’t really stand for anything.
I stand for plenty of things. But I'm not going to buy that the democrats are taking some high minded stance here or on much of anything else. Both parties need to stop putting future generations in debt.
Period.
1
StarWarsMonopoly
6 months ago
You still implied that the GOP policies are more sound, which belies the reality that their policies do not work and lead to tax payers taking the hit while the private sector continues on unscathed.
Unless you’d like to stand against printing trillions while we have the President in office who’s supposed to be running this like a business?
5
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
> You still implied that the GOP policies are more sound
I did no such thing. I simply said that both parties are advocating for the same policy here, and both are wrong to do so and deserve criticism. Then the democratic apologists come along.
0
Mr_Hassel
6 months ago
Because one party is in charge and they were gonna pass it anyway with or without the other one.
3
Mist_Rising
NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods 6 months ago
>Because one party is in charge
Since all bills regarding budget originate in the House, you apparnetly think democratic party is in charge..
1
nslinkns24
"absolutely the worst person I've seen in this sub 6 months ago
The fact is that dems voted for it, meaning they would have supported it even if they were in charge.
1
JoesPartyDepot
6 months ago
Meanwhile, the Dow Jones is up 500 points today because pharmaceutical corporations are gouging people and making a killing.
Disgusting.
17
MarshallGibsonLP
:flag-tx: Texas 6 months ago
At this point the DJIA is completely detached from the health of the economy. It's nothing more than an off-track betting site. And if we're being honest, we should stop referring to it when discussing how the economy is doing.
The reason it is so popular is that the media, and American people by extension need a simple number they can reduce everything down to.
8
Karrde2100
6 months ago
11% unemployment seems pretty simple
As does $850 billion/month deficit...
:(
6
GirlGroupUnderground
6 months ago
That job rejection I got from Gilead a few months back is really stinging right now.
3
Mayor_Minderbinder
6 months ago
Where my Tea Party fiscal patreets at?
trump has added $6,500,000,000,000 to the national debt since 1/20/17 and not a fucking peep about it from Fox News.
22
mikelisse
:flag-ny: New York 6 months ago
> “Nobody is a fiscal conservative anymore,” Limbaugh shot back. “All this talk about concern for the deficit and the budget has been bogus for as long as it’s been around.”
This is Rush Limbaugh’s response to a caller who was concerned about Trump not being a true fiscal conservative because the deficit was going to reach $1 trillion.
1
StupendousMan1995
:flag-ny: New York 6 months ago
Hiding behind their racism over in another sub, I guess...
13
TheVenetianMask
6 months ago
Patting each other on the back for eating fast food is their latest theme.
5
Trending this week..
Join Our Newsletter
Post a Job
Teams Hiring Now
-
TokenSoft is the volume leader in compliant token sales.
-
The open protocol for tokenized debt.
-
A secure online platform for buying, selling, and storing digital currencies.
-
A second layer, off-chain scaling proposal for bitcoin.
-
Ensuring the blockchain is inexpensive and accessible to everyone.
-
An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the ethereum blockchain.
- See all